But a TV show about science fiction ought to be able to get this right as well, and be able to discuss minerals & other basic chemical compounds correctly.
Enter Stargate Universe, a spin off of the Stargate series. In the final part of the series opening, the crew needs to obtain a material from a planet to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere of their ship. The offending dialog:
"Looks like gypsum."
"That would be good."
"Why?"
"We're looking for calcium carbonate..."
"Calcite."
"Gypsum is calcium sulfate, which is 36% calcium carbonate."
Calcium sulfate is 36% calcium carbonate?? Yeah.... no... not to mention the confusions in the episode about lime, calcite, calcium carbonate, and how any of that might be used to remove CO2 from the atmosphere of the planet. They had a reasonable idea, since lime (CaO) plus CO2 can react to form calcite (CaCO3), but it just wasn't executed quite correctly. Bu, there's at least some mention of minerals and their usefulness, even with the errors; in most shows they don't even seem to exist!
More dialog:
More dialog:
"For the sake of portability & efficiency, I'm hoping to find high concentration granular limestone. We are looking for the dry lake bed or salt-water body all the sand came from."
"It's a desert...."
"Lime is formed mostly from the remains of marine organisms."
"Are you saying there's life here?"
"Not likely."
"The water may be gone now, but this desert was formed by H2O evaporating on a playa floor causing gypsum to be deposited in a fine crystalline form called selenite."
Some of the sand is placed in a beaker with a liquid & swirled around, and the solution turns red.
"That supposed to happen?"
"If this sand was high enough in calcite concentration, the solution would absorb the acid."
"The liquid would turn clear."
Hey, an acid-base reaction that's reasonable! Calcite definitely neutralizes acid, while gypsum does not. Unfortunately, the character who seems to know the most about the minerals (a geologist perhaps?), dies at the end of this episode.
Maybe they'll hire you/a geologist to give them some pointers... consultant fees are good!!
ReplyDelete....They did hire a geophysicist: me. Unfortunately, I was hired in the initial conceptual phase of "Can any geological substance be used for rapid carbon sequestration?" not in the final "Can you check our vocabulary usage?" phase.
ReplyDeleteThe use of consultants in the entertainment industry is a bit peculiar, and changes with the different phases of production:
1. Phase 1: The Idea. A consultant is potentially used in the initial phases of the idea. They're currently, usually selected by asking the Science and Entertainment Exchange, or possibly the local university, for an expert opinion. The consultant fees at this stage are usually nonexistent (ie, free volunteer ideas).
2. Phase 2: Writing. During writing, on-staff researchers fill out the details (like the 36% stat above; I have no idea what it's based on). The only consultants used during this period are pretty much friends & family of the writers or researchers; formal consultants very, very, very rarely used in this phase.
3. Phase 3: Filming. Very few shows bother to have a consultant during actual filming, although Stargate frequently did. If so, the consultant is typically paid, and is responsible for dealing with representations of science in props (things the actors touch), set decorations (things the actors stand in front of), and maybe give a few notes for future SFX. I frequently did this for Stargate, but not for this episode.
Yes, Parker is the lone geologist in Stargate: Universe, and she choses to go adventuring into a new stargate instead of remaining with the team. She may or may not have died on that new planet; I personally vote that she found a world of stunning outcrops where it rained beer.
This is such nice and useful information for us. I really appreciate this blog to have this kind of knowledge. Also explore Calcium Carbonate Suppliers
ReplyDelete